Scattered: How Attention Deficit Disorder Originates and What You Can Do About It




  • The following article has been published with kind permission
    from
    Lew Mills,
    PhD, MFT,
    a Bay Area psychotherapist working with Attention Deficit
    in Adults.

    Book Review: Scattered: How Attention Deficit Disorder Originates and What You Can Do About It

    by Gabor Maté, MD, 1999

    Another book claiming that ADHD is caused by environmental
    factors? Sure. And ADHD can be cured in a few weeks with the latest
    snake-oil treatment.

    Those of us who have been around that loop a few times will be
    forgiven for being suspicious of a book that once again seems to
    argue against the given wisdom that ADHD is fundamentally a
    neurobiological disorder, with a large genetic component.

    But Maté’s book does not fall simply into either side of
    the nature/nurture dichotomy. It does allow that there is a
    genetically determined “sensitivity” inherent in ADHD. It also
    insists that there are environmental factors which play a large role
    in how ADHD eventually plays out in the individual. The value of the
    book is in how it elaborates the intricate interplay of “nature” and
    “nurture” factors.

    To choose just one instance of this argument, Maté
    describes a familiar feature of ADHD, which he calls “counterwill.”
    It is sometimes predictable that if you ask an ADHD person to do
    something, they will be vexingly compelled to do the opposite. Their
    will seems to run the other way from whatever direction they are
    being pointed. This is the basis of the overlap of ADHD with
    “oppositional-defiant disorder.”

    It appears to us that an ADHD person is being “too willful.” But
    in fact, it reflects an absence of a well integrated self and “will”
    as well as an environmental experience of being overrun by someone
    else’s will.

    The elaboration of that argument is more complex, but it assumes
    that qualities of the experience of having an ADHD biology can lead
    to predictable developmental consequences if certain environmental
    factors are present. In the case of counterwill, if the ADHD child’s
    attention errors are consistently met by controlling behavior from an
    adult, the ADHD child will learn to counteract the overriding of
    their fragile will by being “strong-willed” in the opposite
    direction.

    The child’s goal is not the specific willful behavior that
    results, but it is rather the assertion of an independent will. The
    child may not even know what they want until they are asked to do one
    particular thing. Then it is completely clear to them that they want
    to do the opposite. This increases the ADHD child’s feeling of
    autonomy, (even though it is in reality the most slavish reactivity
    to other people). Counterwill is desperately required, in order to
    not feel the complete dissolution of their own will.

    So this has a clear environmental component, even as it also stems
    in part from the difficulty that the ADHD child has in constituting
    their own sense of self-direction and self-control. Presumably, if
    raised in ideal conditions, ADHD children would not develop
    counterwill . Hence, counterwill is not a part of the “biology” of
    ADHD. However, given the predictable negative and controlling
    reactions of imperfect adults to the frustrations of “cat-herding” an
    ADHD child, counterwill is likely to develop in the ADHD child with
    some frequency. The overwhelmed adult, by increasingly controlling
    the behavior of the ADHD child, unintentionally creates the
    oppositional behavior that makes their task so much more difficult.
    Biology interacts with a predictable environment to reach an unhappy
    but common result.

    More broadly, the theme that runs underneath the greater part of
    the book is that stress amongst parents (or primary care-givers) is
    fundamental to the development of ADHD. This stress leaves the
    parents unable to sufficiently pay attention to the emotional needs
    of the child, which in turn leads to a disturbed attachment process
    that Maté sees as characteristic of ADHD children. Maté
    asserts that the genetic predisposition to ADHD is based on an
    oversensitivity to these stresses in the parents. Only the
    combination of stressed, emotionally unavailable parents and the
    genetic oversensitivity will lead to ADHD.

    Maté does not argue, as some others might, that ADHD causes
    the parenting problems in the first place. He claims that the
    parenting problems exacerbate the ADHD issues that the child comes to
    physiologically. But it would make sense to extend his argument that
    environment and genetics interact continuously. Those of us who have
    been there know: not only do parents affect the ADHD child, but the
    ADHD child profoundly influences the parent.

    Personally, I feel that the “nurture” case is overstated in
    Maté’s book, even though the general thrust makes sense. The
    overemphasis on attachment issues in ADHD neglects that many other
    independent disorders include disturbances in attachment. Attachment
    issues are probably not the defining characteristic of ADHD.

    I also think that Maté underplays the significance of
    medications in treatment. Even though he acknowledges the sometimes
    dramatic improvements that medication can make, he tends to see the
    disorder primarily as psychological. Hence psychological treatments
    take precedence over biological ones. The therapeutic effect of
    “unconditional positive regard” is considered “first line” treatment,
    with medication as an adjunct. In my experience, the medication can
    have such a profound effect, that it makes little sense to not try
    this first. Of course I also agree that the psychological
    consequences of ADHD need to be addressed for substantial improvement
    to occur.

    Of course, the main danger of describing ADHD psychologically is
    that it is interpreted as a problem that should be surmounted purely
    psychologically. There are people who will blame themselves forever
    for just “not trying hard enough” rather than face a real
    physiological difficulty that they can treat physiologically.

    Maté does not put it together entirely psychologically, but
    I remain nervous about that risk. I do not think that anyone is
    served well if we categorically fall back to blaming parents and
    schools for not adapting to ADHD children better. We have had to work
    hard to get past the “psychologizing” of ADHD as the product of a
    “too fast culture” or relaxed parenting standards and so on. The task
    is not to throw out the insights of a physiological explanation, but
    to expand it by looking at the interplay of the given, genetic nature
    and the environmental nurture where it plays out.

    Top

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *